The Supreme Court has given a 5-4 ruling that prevents Michigan from suing to block a casino that is off-reservation. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
The rules casinos that are governing by indigenous American tribal groups are varied and complex, relying on both federal laws and the compacts signed between states and the tribes that reside within them. This plays out in legal battles across the country, including the one that had been just settled in the court that is highest associated with the land.
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled this week that Michigan cannot sue a tribe to stop the opening and operation of a casino that is indian as tribal sovereign immunity overrules the state’s legal challenges. Your decision was an one that is divisive as the justices were split 5-4 in support of the Bay Mills Indian Community.
Off-Reservation Casino at Heart of Case
The case revolved around a casino that the Bay Mills tribe built in 2010 about 90 miles south of its reservation, which can be positioned on Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The tribe had purchased land there with money it received as part of money because of the authorities over allegations that they had not been precisely compensated for land they threw in the towel in 19th century treaties.
Because the casino was constructed on off-reservation land, Michigan had argued that its procedure was in violation of the state compact and without permission throughContinue reading